About NICE CXone







NICE CXone pricing
NICE CXone does not have a free version but does offer a free trial. NICE CXone paid version starts at US$100.00/month.
Alternatives to NICE CXone
NICE CXone Reviews
Feature rating

- Industry: Facilities Services
- Company size: 1,001–5,000 Employees
- Used Daily for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Great for a small call center
My team manages a mini call center composed of 5 specialists that that handle incoming calls from our vendor network throughout the day. During high volume days, calls are looped among the specialists in order to avoid missing any calls and requiring a vendor to leave a voicemail. This software was easy for our IT department to transition between looped calls and standard call processes. I believe that this is software can grow with your company whether you have 5 employees or 500.
Pros
Mostly reliant software with great sound quality
Great call routing features and automation
Quality call recording options (useful for escalations or PIP)
Cost effective due to the entire company using the platform (may be expensive for smaller teams)
Cons
When system is down, missed calls are lost
System support can be slow at times
Reporting capabilities could be expanded (improved dashboards)
- Industry: Nonprofit Organisation Management
- Company size: 1,001–5,000 Employees
- Used Daily for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Have been using NICE inContact since 2009
My overall experience with NICE inContact has been fantastic. I enjoy working with my reps as we together try to find the best solution to our problems. I feel they have truly been our partner.
Pros
I worked as an end user of NICE inContact in FamilySearch Support and for the past 4 years I have been working as the FamilySearch Telecommunications Product Engineer. As an end user I found the product to be easy to use and reliable. I was able to seamlessly take chats and calls up to 30 in a day. As the Administrator CXOne/inContact Central is easy to use creating skills, users, and security profiles. As the Engineer working in Studio and creating call flows with Salesforce integration I find the product robust and basically if you can think of it, there is most likely a way to make it happen using APIs and the inContact Studio. I was able to learn the basics and build from there with little training. And what I don't know NICE inContact engineers and account managers are there to help.
Cons
In Salesforce there is a feature that you can login as the user to see what the user is seeing. inContact doesn't have that feature. To troubleshoot a user issue I have to go to some lengths to change the users password and login as them to see if I can see what they are reporting. Speaking of reporting, I know the CXOne platform has addons for better reporting but I feel the dashboards and basic reporting could be made better. For example to be able to drill down on a dashboard to specifics even on the user level.
Response from NICE inContact
Thanks for your feedback, Warren!
- Industry: Hospitality
- Company size: 51–200 Employees
- Used Daily for 2+ years
-
Review Source
Omnichannel, Multi-site, International Contact Center
InContact has allowed us to increase flexibility in handling contacts across multiple sites. We have been able to utilize functionality that allows our agents to know the guest who is calling and the reason for their contact. Like any tool, there is pros and cons. We have had to adapt some of our business practices to the tool. It is nice, no pun intended, to have all of our tools in one platform (ACD, Quality, Reporting, WFM, etc.).
Pros
InContact allows us to utilize our global staff to ensure our guests receive prompt response time to their phone calls, emails, and chats. We are able to skill and staff our agents across multiple sites to increase efficiency. The software was easy to learn and adapt to for our users when we switched. The tool gives us access to data both real-time and historical needed to make decisions and operate effectively. We are able to have multiple tools (WFM, Quality, ACD, Reporting, etc.) in one platform.
Cons
We skill agents with both voice and digital (email and chat) skills. Because InContact treats chat as a digital media type, it will route both chats and phone calls at the same time which is challenging and limits our ability to utilize the omnichannel feature as we would want to.
Without case ownership on email, each reply after the initial email may route to a different agent, which creates challenges with continuity of the communication.
Email reporting has been and continues to be a challenge. It is difficult for us to see how many emails were handled on a certain day if the email was handled on a different day than when it came into the system.
Response from NICE inContact
Thank you for your detailed review. We are always working to improve our software. We will pass along your valuable insight to our development teams.
- Industry: Computer Software
- Company size: 201–500 Employees
- Used Daily for 6-12 months
-
Review Source
The cloud-based customer experience tool NICE CXone offers a complete answer.
In general, NICE CXone is a strong and complete tool that helps companies of all kinds increase client engagement and satisfaction. Businesses seeking to offer a seamless and customised client experience should consider it because of its omnichannel routing, labour management, and data capabilities.
Pros
businesses aiming to raise client happiness and involvement. In order to provide a smooth user experience, this platform provides a broad variety of features, including digital navigation, labour management, analytics, and automation.
Cons
To enhance the customer experience, this data can be used to pinpoint problem areas and inform data-driven choices.
- Industry: Telecommunications
- Company size: 10,000+ Employees
- Used Daily for 1+ year
-
Review Source
Dec.2019_3M_US_Admin_Support_inContact
Fast to learn
Efficient to setup
Good training documentation
Wonderful tech support
Great experience
Pros
The details offered to discover path of contacts, simple process of escalating issues, and efficiency of setup of users and ACD elements are the best I've dealt with in my 25 years of ACD phone support.
Our TAM is amazing & knows her stuff.
Reports are capable of great detail
Cons
Because of the open structure to access so much detail, it takes time to analyze what everything means.
The integration with Salesforce is wonderful, but seems a challenge to avoid daily errors; often clearing cache and cookies...I know this has much more to do with 3M's network and Salesforce, but everyone thinks it is the phone that causes the problem.
We tried to standardize ACD routing setup, however, the cleanup from each deployment sent us down custom paths again; I understand the goal to eventually streamline with the Global Scripts - this is the right thing to do and will make things better, it will just take awhile to get there.
Response from NICE inContact
We're so happy to hear about your great experience! Thank you, Shelly!