--- description: Review of Responsive Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice Ireland. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Responsive | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice IE --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Project Management Software](/directory/4430/project-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/425174/RFPIO) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/425174/RFPIO Page: 1 / 9\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/425174/RFPIO?page=2) > Responsive (formerly RFPIO) is the industry leader in Strategic Response Management with a suite of AI-driven solutions to help bid and response teams win more deals with smarter, faster responses. Responsive AI drafts answers and manages collaborative workflows so your teams can deliver winning responses to RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, VSQs, and more 80% faster. Harness a single source of truth so your frontline teams can share and exchange critical information while confidently responding to bids, inquiries, and questionnaires with the best answers from the most intelligent solution. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 188 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 188 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Location**: Beaverton, US - **Founded**: 2015 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Usage Based - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: Chinese, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Traditional Chinese - **Available Countries**: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden and 3 more ## Features - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Alerts/Notifications - Audit Trail - Automatic Formatting - Bid Management - CRM - Collaboration Tools - Commenting/Notes - Communication Management - Configurable Workflow - Contact Management - Content Library - Content Management - Customisable Reports - Customisable Templates - Data Import/Export - Document Automation ## Integrations (26 total) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... and 11 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Project Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4430/project-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Project Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4430/project-management/software) - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4252/proposal-management/software) - [Business Process Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4351/bpm/software) - [Workflow Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4272/workflow/software) - [RFP Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4510/rfp/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Breeze](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/525223/Breeze) — 5.0/5 (15 reviews) 2. [XaitPorter](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/85121/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (46 reviews) 3. [Axonaut](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/266387/axonaut) — 4.6/5 (22 reviews) 4. [VT Docs](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/212767/vt-docs) — 4.9/5 (52 reviews) 5. [PandaDoc](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/144409/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1245 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Affordable, comprehensive platform with superior admin / user support" — 5.0/5 > **Brian** | *21 May 2019* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: RFPIO's answer library is a miracle with great features. The library provides a way to assign different owners and keep individual Q\&A pairs updated in real. Access to our stock answers saves our users and SMEs hundreds of hours each quarter and affords them more time to devote to their primary job functions while spending less time on researching technical responses. > > **Cons**: RFPIO is great for small to moderate sized teams. For larger organizations who complete 20 or more RFPs per month with multiple RFP teams working at the same time, multiple, parallel instances of RFPIO may be needed to best suit those needs on a grand scale. > > Hundreds of hours saved in responding to questionnaires and RFPs. RFPIO offers very competitive cost savings over most of the larger RFP software providers. The same functionality at a fraction of the cost of the big guys. Customer support is top notch - all questions or requests for help are addressed within the same day (or within 24 hours at most). Great, direct support from the management team - no call centers, no outsourced product support. You get assistance from people who helped build the product. ----- ### "Responsive is great\!" — 5.0/5 > **Gabriella** | *7 April 2026* | Human Resources | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like that is very easy to manage my projects and split responsibilities between the people involved. I like that is easy to flag and assign reviwers. Also, I like how easy it is to manage the content library and flag questions. > > **Cons**: I would love if it had a "notes" section in each project so everyone could share notes and perceptions about the project. Also, I would love if the review in content library was easier to manage, just as a a project. > > My overall experience is positive, I have total control of my RFPs and of everything that is happening in the projects I am the manager ----- ### "Review of Responsive" — 3.0/5 > **Dante** | *19 March 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 1.0/10 > > **Pros**: Its all in one, I feel it covers what is required to have a repository of data around rfps, rfx, rfi and other stuff > > **Cons**: Filtering, search, it does not find relevant information, this could be that the data is not made available as expected > > Its ok, I feel it can be improved and make it more intuitive , faster and easier to use for all teams involved ----- ### "Responsiveness at Its Best." — 5.0/5 > **Anjali** | *27 March 2026* | Financial Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about Responsive is how it categorizes each product clearly, and how every section has its own owner. This makes it very easy to understand which business unit to reach out to. > > **Cons**: The aspect I find least favorable is that when exporting to Excel or Word, the formatting often becomes inconsistent despite selecting a specific font. > > My overall experience with Responsive has been quite positive. The platform stands out for its clear structure and organization—each product is categorized neatly, and every section has a designated owner, which makes it easy to know exactly who to reach out to within different business units. That clarity really streamlines communication and reduces confusion. ----- ### "Underwriter's Perspective on Responsive" — 4.0/5 > **Justin** | *28 April 2026* | Pharmaceuticals | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like that it is a one stop shop for all stakeholders in the RFP process where RFP asks, conversations and workflows can all be housed in one spot. It is easy to see what has been answered, what remains to review and easy to assign team members where needed to get the right people on the right questions to keep the workflow moving. > > **Cons**: There are sometimes issues with the responses that are automatically pulled in where a question has a auto-response that does not answer the question being asked. > > Overall I have had a good experience using Responsive. I think it is a valuable resource for what it is. It is easy to then also have a document created with a record of how we responded for future reference. ----- Page: 1 / 9\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/425174/RFPIO?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/425174/RFPIO) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Structured Data