--- description: Review of AwardScience Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs on Software Advice Ireland. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: AwardScience | Reviews, Pricing & Demos - SoftwareAdvice IE --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Grant Management Software](/directory/644/grant-management/software) > [AwardScience](/software/537985/Nobel) # AwardScience Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/537985/Nobel Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/537985/Nobel?page=2) > AwardScience manages the full lifecycle of awards, grants, and scholarships on one platform. It is used by foundations, corporations, government agencies, universities, accelerators, incubators, and scholarship administrators running programs at any scale, from a single regional award to multi-tenant global deployments across categories and regions. Building a program starts with the form. Describe what you need in plain language and AwardScience's AI generates the entire form structure for you. From there, the no-code builder lets you drag in any of 30+ field types, including documents, videos, portfolios, quizzes, and voting, and add conditional logic that shows or hides fields based on what applicants answer. Every change is versioned, so rolling back is always an option. The same AI can generate your workflow too: stages, branching conditions, and automated actions on a visual canvas you publish when ready. No developer is involved at any point. The AI keeps working once applications arrive. When an applicant uploads a document, AwardScience reads it and pre-fills the relevant form fields automatically, cutting both application time and reviewer workload. LinkedIn auto-fill does the same for profile data in a single click. Judges then receive AI-generated scores with written reasoning attached for each submission, so panels start from an informed position rather than a blank page. Any judge can hit Ask AI on a specific field to summarize, probe, or compare an answer without leaving the review screen. A built-in anomaly view ranks submissions by score divergence across the panel, surfacing disagreements early. Semantic duplicate detection compares entries by meaning rather than keywords, so look-alike submissions surface even when the wording differs. Applicants move through a guided multi-stage process with autosave, deadline countdowns, status tracking, and color-coded reviewer notes visible from their own dashboard. Teams can apply together, reusable records carry information across multiple programs, and every application exports as a PDF in one click. Program managers get a live analytics dashboard with 20+ charts covering submission velocity, conversion rates, geographic reach, and judging progress. They can ask plain-language questions about the applicant pool and get streaming AI analysis back in seconds. The AI Professional Finder works the same way for recruiting judges: describe the expertise you need, receive a scored shortlist of matching professionals, and AwardScience drafts the invitation emails. Reports export to Excel on demand. Email, SMS, and WhatsApp communications are all built in with delivery and click tracking included. Sponsors get a read-focused view with live dashboards, AI-powered pool analysis, and season-by-season comparisons for board reporting. Auditors get a read-only, tamper-evident trail of every action, form version, permission change, and AI operation, all exportable for compliance. Access control goes well beyond standard roles. Permissions can be scoped by account type, process stage, and field-level conditions combined with AND/OR logic. AwardScience supports multiple languages natively, with AI-assisted translation for other content. The infrastructure is GDPR-compliant, ISO 27001-ready, with encrypted storage and daily backups. Book a demo to see it running on a live program. > > Verdict: Rated **5.0/5** by 11 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **5.0/5** | 11 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: KY & Company ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$149.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: It is billed annually; the price shown is the monthly cost. - **Target Audience**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: Brazilian Portuguese, Chinese, English, French, German, Spanish, Traditional Chinese - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 209 more ## Features - AI Copilot - API - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Administrative Reporting - Alerts/Notifications - Applicant Tracking - Application Management - Approval Process Control - Audit Trail - Categorisation/Grouping - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Management - Configurable Workflow - Contact Management - Customisable Branding - Customisable Forms - Customisable Questions - Customisable Reports - Customisable Templates ## Integrations (4 total) - Azure Active Directory External Identities - SAP BW/4HANA - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Zapier ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Grant Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/644/grant-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Grant Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/644/grant-management/software) - [Scholarship Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/directory/4373/scholarship-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Instrumentl](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/317455/instrumentl) — 5.0/5 (190 reviews) 2. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/32548/fluxx) — 4.3/5 (96 reviews) 3. [Submittable](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/166870/submittable) — 4.8/5 (398 reviews) 4. [Good Grants](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/411585/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 5. [RQ Platform](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/262854/rq-awards) — 4.7/5 (40 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Powerful and flexible platform for award and grant management" — 5.0/5 > **Sohan Gupta** | *26 June 2026* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Nobel makes the full award and grant process much easier to manage from start to finish. The visual workflow builder and no code form builder give teams a lot of flexibility, while features like conditional branching, deadline scheduling, automated reminders, and analytics dashboards help reduce manual work and improve oversight. I also like that the platform supports team collaboration well, with reusable records, team applications, granular permissions, and clear dashboards for applicants, judges, and program managers. The AI features are especially impressive and genuinely useful. AI assisted scoring with written reasoning helps reviewers move faster while still keeping decisions transparent and structured. Features like Ask AI, AI insights, similarity detection, professional matching, and document extraction add real value because they reduce manual effort, surface useful patterns, and help teams make better decisions more efficiently. Instead of feeling like extras, the AI tools feel meaningfully integrated into the platform. > > **Cons**: Teams that only need a very simple application process may not use the full depth of tools such as branching logic, advanced permissions, and analytics. > > My overall experience with Nobel has been very positive. It stands out as a strong platform for organizations running awards, grants, and multi stage review programs because it combines ease of use with advanced functionality for data management, collaboration, and process automation. It is particularly valuable for teams that want one system for applications, judging, reporting, communication, and tracking funding opportunities without relying on multiple separate tools. ----- ### "Game-changing AI tools and a visual workflow builder that saves our team endless hours" — 5.0/5 > **Ryle** | *4 August 2026* | Civic & Social Organization | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The node-based visual workflow builder and AI professional matching features are phenomenal. Being able to physically map out application pathways, conditional branching, and automated email/WhatsApp triggers on a visual canvas gives us total clarity before launching. The AI assistant also helps suggest and score expert reviewers based on specific domain expertise, taking the guesswork out of panel assembly. > > **Cons**: Because the visual builder offers so much granular control over conditions and actions, it requires a short testing phase to ensure your logic flows match your exact desired execution before going live. > > AwardScience feels like a generation ahead of traditional awards platforms. Combining automated multi-channel messaging (both email and WhatsApp) with intelligent reviewer matching has eliminated operational friction. It empowers our small team to manage complex, modern recognition programs with zero developer intervention. ----- ### "Replaced our messy Google Forms setup in days—best decision for our team" — 5.0/5 > **Yan** | *4 August 2026* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The speed of implementation and ease of adoption were incredible. Moving away from a manual setup of Google Forms, shared drives, and tracking sheets was painless. The form builder is flexible enough to handle complex file uploads and multi-part entry questions, while the dashboard gives us immediate visibility into completed vs. draft applications without having to manually check spreadsheets. > > **Cons**: While the core features are super easy to pick up, a few advanced automation triggers require dipping into settings menus that aren't immediately obvious. A quick-search bar in the admin dashboard to jump straight to specific settings would save time. > > Switching to AwardScience was one of the highest-ROI operational software decisions we've made. It took our awards program from looking like a small internal project to feeling like a tier-one, professional competition. The reduction in applicant support tickets and administrative confusion paid for the platform in our very first cycle. ----- ### "A modern and surprisingly smooth awards management platform" — 5.0/5 > **Sam** | *28 April 2026* | Education Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: We used Nobel to manage our awards program, and it made the whole process much easier to control\! Setting up submissions, assigning reviewers, tracking judging progress, and checking results were all straightforward. The platform felt clean, organized, and easy for both admins and applicants to use, which saved us a lot of manual follow-up. > > **Cons**: Some of the more advanced settings may take a little time to configure properly at the beginning, especially if the awards program has several stages or different judging rules. Once everything is set up, though, the platform is easy to manage. > > Nobel was easy to use, well-structured, and reliable throughout the awards process. It helped our team run submissions and judging more efficiently, while keeping the experience simple for both admins and applicants. ----- ### "Enterprise-grade governance, defensible audit trails, and airtight compliance" — 5.0/5 > **Ray** | *4 August 2026* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: As an organization with strict governance standards, AwardScience gives us complete control over data privacy, blind reviews, and role-based access. The permanent audit log tracks every scoring revision, comment, and decision step, which is vital for maintaining transparency and answering compliance queries. Combined with GDPR readiness and robust infrastructure, we feel completely confident storing sensitive proposal data on the platform. > > **Cons**: Setting up complex role-based permissions down to specific form fields takes careful planning up front, though it ultimately gives us the exact security isolation we need. > > AwardScience has provided our foundation with an accountable, defensible selection process. It gives our board, auditors, and applicants total confidence that entries are evaluated fairly and securely. If compliance and data integrity are top priorities for your organization, this platform is an ideal choice. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/537985/Nobel?page=2) ## Links - [View on SoftwareAdvice](https://www.softwareadvice.ie/software/537985/Nobel) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Structured Data